Wiktenauer logo.png

Difference between revisions of "User:Kendra Brown/Florius/English MS Latin 11269 27r"

From Wiktenauer
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<noinclude>==Latin 27r== Page:MS Latin 11269 27r.jpg {{#lsth:Page:MS Latin 11269 27r.jpg}} == Italian == {| |- | Because my sword has received a blow<br/> And because o...")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  
 
|  
Because my sword has received a blow<br/>
+
Placeholder
And because of this catch, my pommel strikes you in the face.&emsp;
 
 
| {{section|Page:Pisani-Dossi MS 22a.jpg|22a-c}}
 
| {{section|Page:Pisani-Dossi MS 22a.jpg|22a-c}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  
 
|  
This is another strike with my pommel,<br/>
+
placeholder
Following the quickness of the art and the masters.&emsp;
 
 
| {{section|Page:Pisani-Dossi MS 22a.jpg|22a-d}}
 
| {{section|Page:Pisani-Dossi MS 22a.jpg|22a-d}}
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 19:20, 26 December 2023

Latin 27r

Page:MS Latin 11269 27r.jpg

In cruce prevalidus proprium tibi carpo mucronem.
Hinc te iam mestum cesura cuspide sive
Percutiam. spätaeque manus attollere dicor
Conträrium[1]. et valeo tua membra ferire patenter.
Tangere nec poteris ullis violatibus ensem.

Te iacio in terram magno/ quem precipis / actu
Nec sum deceptus ensem tibi ponere collo.

Italian

Placeholder

placeholder

English 27r

 




MS Latin 11269 27r.jpg

  1. These umlaut-like dots appear on a few other pages, where they indicate words that should be read as a pair. Here the marked words are both part of a phrase naming a technique, similar to other times the dots appear. Interestingly, on this page it looks like the dots were written by the original scribe (for example, the dots over the a in spataeque have the same faded look as the a). However, appearing on so few pages, these dots don't seem to be part of the overall orthographic style of the manuscript.