Wiktenauer logo.png

Difference between revisions of "Category:Man vs. Woman"

From Wiktenauer
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This category was formerly titled [[:category:Marriage Counseling|Marriage Counseling]], a joke based on this statement in [[Hans Talhoffer]]'s 1467 treatise found in the manuscript [[Talhoffer Fechtbuch (Cod.icon. 394a)|Cod.icon. 394a]]:
 
This category was formerly titled [[:category:Marriage Counseling|Marriage Counseling]], a joke based on this statement in [[Hans Talhoffer]]'s 1467 treatise found in the manuscript [[Talhoffer Fechtbuch (Cod.icon. 394a)|Cod.icon. 394a]]:
  
:{{#if:1|<span class="plainlinks">{{#if:122v|{{#ifeq:122v|-||<small style="font-weight:normal; vertical-align:text-bottom;">&#91;[{{fullurl:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg}} 122v]&#93;</small>&nbsp;}}|<small style="font-weight:normal; vertical-align:text-bottom;">&#91;[{{fullurl:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg}} 1]&#93;</small>&nbsp;}}{{#if: | [No text] | {{#lst:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg|1}} }}</span>|<div class="plainlinks">
+
:<span class="plainlinks"><small style="font-weight:normal; vertical-align:text-bottom;">&#91;[{{fullurl:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg}} 122v]&#93;</small>&nbsp;''{{#lst:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg|1}}''</span>
{{#if:122v|{{#ifeq:122v|-||<small style="font-weight:normal; vertical-align:text-bottom;">&#91;[{{fullurl:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg}} 122v]&#93;</small>&nbsp;}}|<small style="font-weight:normal; vertical-align:text-bottom;">&#91;[{{fullurl:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg}} 1]&#93;</small>&nbsp;}}{{#if: | [No text] | {{#lst:Page:Cod.icon. 394a 122v.jpg|1}} }}
 
</div>}}
 
  
This was translated by Mark Rector as "The beginning stance in which the man and wife shall fight each other"; the German phrase ''Mann und Frau''
+
The German phrase ''Mann und Frau'' is slightly ambiguous, meaning either "man and woman" or "husband and wife". In his translation of 2000, Mark Rector chose the latter interpretation and rendered it "The beginning stance in which the man and wife shall fight each other".
  
 +
However, more recent scholarship has shown that this reading is wrong. This dueling form, which exists in lawbooks but as far as we know was never used in real life,<ref>There are certainly records of women dueling with men in the Medieval period, including a specific reference in the Bern Chronicle to a duel that took place in 1288 in which the woman defeated the man, but there is no indication that this specific (and very strange) format was used in any of them. Which is not to say that such evidence will never appear as research on the history of dueling continues. There was no evidence of [[longshield]] dueling in the 15th century either, until a few years ago when [[Jens P. Kleinau]] found some.</ref> was not specifically designed for marital disputes; instead, a number of legal actions a woman might bring against a man (related or not) could be resolved this way in the absence of evidence, include rape and assault. In his new translation of 2016, Dierk Hagedorn renders this passage "Here it is stated how a man and woman shall fight each other. Here they stand, ready to begin."
 +
 +
Based on our understanding of the history of dueling, this reading seems more correct, and the category name has been changed to reflect it.
  
 
[[category:weapons]]
 
[[category:weapons]]

Revision as of 17:56, 25 November 2020

This category was formerly titled Marriage Counseling, a joke based on this statement in Hans Talhoffer's 1467 treatise found in the manuscript Cod.icon. 394a:

[122v] Da Statt Wie Man vnd Frowen mit ainander kempffen sollen vnd stand hie In dem anfanng.

The German phrase Mann und Frau is slightly ambiguous, meaning either "man and woman" or "husband and wife". In his translation of 2000, Mark Rector chose the latter interpretation and rendered it "The beginning stance in which the man and wife shall fight each other".

However, more recent scholarship has shown that this reading is wrong. This dueling form, which exists in lawbooks but as far as we know was never used in real life,[1] was not specifically designed for marital disputes; instead, a number of legal actions a woman might bring against a man (related or not) could be resolved this way in the absence of evidence, include rape and assault. In his new translation of 2016, Dierk Hagedorn renders this passage "Here it is stated how a man and woman shall fight each other. Here they stand, ready to begin."

Based on our understanding of the history of dueling, this reading seems more correct, and the category name has been changed to reflect it.

  1. There are certainly records of women dueling with men in the Medieval period, including a specific reference in the Bern Chronicle to a duel that took place in 1288 in which the woman defeated the man, but there is no indication that this specific (and very strange) format was used in any of them. Which is not to say that such evidence will never appear as research on the history of dueling continues. There was no evidence of longshield dueling in the 15th century either, until a few years ago when Jens P. Kleinau found some.

Pages in category "Man vs. Woman"

The following 5 pages are in this category, out of 5 total.