Wiktenauer logo.png

Difference between revisions of "Page:MS V.b.104 106v.png"

From Wiktenauer
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Not proofread: Created page with "or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged in:<br/> differentlie, as yf two doe wrestle, and they both fall at one<br/> instaunte togethers, neither of them can...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Page statusPage status
-
Not proofread
+
Proofread
Page body (to be transcluded):Page body (to be transcluded):
Line 1: Line 1:
or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged in:<br/>
+
or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged indifferentlie,
differentlie, as yf two doe wrestle, and they both fall at one<br/>
+
as yf two doe wrestle, and they both fall at one  
instaunte togethers, neither of them can be saide to have de:<br/>
+
instaunte togethers, neither of them can be saide to have deserued
serued victorie or reproche. And such was the opinion of<br/>
+
victorie or reproche. And such was the opinion of  
Angelo di Perugia in a question that happened in fight<br/>
+
''Angelo di Perugia'' in a question that happened in fight  
betwext two ffrenchemen at Padoa wherfore seinge<br/>
+
betwext two ffrenchemen at ''Padoa'' wherfore seinge  
that the Challenger died not havinge performed his pmise<br/>
+
that the Challenger died not havinge performed his pmise  
he ought of right to lose the victorie & his goodes also, yet<br/>
+
he ought of right to lose the victorie & his goodes also, yet  
because the defender died & so not sufficient to receave<br/>
+
because the defender died & so not sufficient to receave  
victorie, therfore I referre small Iudgemt to the nomber<br/>
+
victorie, therfore I referre small Iudgemt to the nomber  
of more expert Soldiers.<br/>
+
of more expert Soldiers. ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ .
<br/>
+
Of two men at Armes, Wherof the one Vnhor:<br/>
+
''Of two men at Armes, Wherof the one Vnhorsed, wth his sworde strake his owne horse, wch horse througe furie of ye wonde goeth to the other horse & fightinge wth him causeth his rider als to fall, in falling breaketh his legge & dieth''
sed, wth his sworde strake his owne horse, wch<br/>
+
 
horse througe furie of ye wonde goeth to the other<br/>
+
''Ca. 14.''
horse & fightinge wth him causeth his rider<br/>
+
 
als to fall, in falling breaketh his legge & dieth<br/>
+
'''It''' hapened that two men at armes beinge at defiaunce  
<br/>
+
came to combatt wthin a certeine feilde appointed owte by  
Ca. 14. <br/>
+
the furrowe of a plowe where the one gave his ennemie so  
<br/>
+
great & violente a blowe, as therwthall he was both vnhorsed,
It hapened that two men at armes beinge at defiaunce<br/>
+
and also striken owt of the lists, who findinge him  
came to combatt wthin a certeine feilde appointed owte by<br/>
+
selfe thus overthrowne, not knowinge by what meane he  
the furrowe of a plowe where the one gave his ennemie so<br/>
+
might offende his ennemie and save him selfe, wth his  
great & violente a blowe, as therwthall he was both vn:<br/>
+
sworde he strake his owne horse, the greif wherof so  
horsed, and also striken owt of the lists, who findinge him<br/>
+
moved & provoked him, that all in a rage he fell to bottinge  
selfe thus overthrowne, not knowinge by what meane he<br/>
+
and yarking at the horse of his ennemie, wch he continued  
might offende his ennemie and save him selfe, wth his<br/>
+
so longe that he ouerthrewe him, & in fallinge the man  
sworde he strake his owne horse, the greif wherof so<br/>
+
brake his legge & also hardelie escaped wth liffe. The  
moved & provoked him, that all in a rage he fell to bottinge<br/>
+
question in this case was whether of them had obteined  
and yarking at the horse of his ennemie, wch he continued<br/>
+
victorie. And first in the favour of him that had vnhorsed
so longe that he ouerthrewe him, & in fallinge the man<br/>
+
his ennemie & cast him owt of the lists yt may be
brake his legge & also hardelie escaped wth liffe. The<br/>
 
question in this case was whether of them had obteined<br/>
 
victorie. And first in the favour of him that had vnhor:<br/>
 
sed his ennemie & cast him owt of the lists yt may be
 

Latest revision as of 22:26, 18 May 2021

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

or loue of their Misteris then the victorie shalbe iudged indifferentlie, as yf two doe wrestle, and they both fall at one instaunte togethers, neither of them can be saide to have deserued victorie or reproche. And such was the opinion of Angelo di Perugia in a question that happened in fight betwext two ffrenchemen at Padoa wherfore seinge that the Challenger died not havinge performed his pmise he ought of right to lose the victorie & his goodes also, yet because the defender died & so not sufficient to receave victorie, therfore I referre small Iudgemt to the nomber of more expert Soldiers. ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ .

Of two men at Armes, Wherof the one Vnhorsed, wth his sworde strake his owne horse, wch horse througe furie of ye wonde goeth to the other horse & fightinge wth him causeth his rider als to fall, in falling breaketh his legge & dieth

Ca. 14.

It hapened that two men at armes beinge at defiaunce came to combatt wthin a certeine feilde appointed owte by the furrowe of a plowe where the one gave his ennemie so great & violente a blowe, as therwthall he was both vnhorsed, and also striken owt of the lists, who findinge him selfe thus overthrowne, not knowinge by what meane he might offende his ennemie and save him selfe, wth his sworde he strake his owne horse, the greif wherof so moved & provoked him, that all in a rage he fell to bottinge and yarking at the horse of his ennemie, wch he continued so longe that he ouerthrewe him, & in fallinge the man brake his legge & also hardelie escaped wth liffe. The question in this case was whether of them had obteined victorie. And first in the favour of him that had vnhorsed his ennemie & cast him owt of the lists yt may be